Book Review: Take The Lead

Take the Lead - A Revolutionary Approach to Coaching Cross Country
By Scott Simmons and Will Freeman

Reviewed by Katie Wolpert

Just like a good doctor knows to treat the problem to get rid of the symptom, with Take the Lead Will Freeman and Scott Simmons have dug straight down to the root of coaching philosophy and practices to help you find answers to your most pressing questions. The book takes a straight-forward, no frills approach to learning about coaching. This fact makes the book appropriate for coaches at all levels - from grade school through master’s levels.

If you are looking for a Daniels’ Running Formula-like collection of tables and charts explaining what you need to be doing when and how fast and for how long, you will not find that in Take the Lead. In fact, the authors argue that such charts have very limited use in the wide-world of real life coaching and training. They hope instead to provide the reader with “the concepts and guidance for you to develop your own philosophy and to build a program with respect to your qualities as a coach, the uniqueness of your training environment and the specificity of your athletes.”

Simmons is a hugely successful NAIA coach currently working at Virginia Commonwealth University. His multiple team and individual champions are the most noticeable outward sign of his quiet, effective coaching methods. Freeman is the long-time coach at Grinnell College in Iowa where he has managed to produce results of surprising consistency and quality from the ever changing cast of characters found on a small college campus. Freeman has also been involved in coaching education for many years. Both have made themselves lifelong students of the sport and urge all coaches - indeed, all runners too - to do the same. For while their results have been consistent, they will quickly point out that their methods have been constantly evolving and changing to fit the needs of their programs on a day to day basis.

At times in the book, the reader might feel overwhelmed by the simplicity of the concepts being discussed. The methods presented make so much sense, that one is left with the feeling of having known it already. The writing is simple and informal and in the end, the authors do not claim to have the final answers to anyone’s questions - including their own. Instead they leave the responsibility with the reader to improve his or her methods based on the described concepts.

In his introduction, Freeman urges the reader to “ponder these concepts, be ready to kill some sacred cows… and remember, ultimately it is you that has the right answers for your athletes.”

The ten chapters address everything from basic coaching philosophy to preparing your athletes to race effectively and with confidence to sorting out the lifestyle choices of a collegiate cross country runner.

As described by Will himself, “short and with no fluff,” Take the Lead could be the meat and potatoes from which every coach can construct a successful running program.



Copies of Take the Lead can be ordered for $25 from Will or Scott at the following addresses:

Will Freeman
c/o Athletics
Grinnell College
1118 10th Ave.
Grinnell, IA 50112
Scott Simmons
c/o Athletics
V.I.C.
1013 Moore St.
Bristol, VA 24201

One Runner’s View: Its All About the Uniforms

by Matt Taylor

Summer brings two of my favorite annual events: The Golden League track series and the Tour de France. Both events highlight the best athletes and draw the largest crowds. Yet while I can – and do – get wrapped up in the Tour, I wonder if cyclists get wrapped up in our biggest track meets? I doubt it - they’re not even on TV - and I think I know why.


I have a love-hate relationship with summer. On the one hand, who can argue against extra daylight, catching a game at Fenway Park, and developing the world’s worst watch tan? Not me. But when June turns to July the dark side of summer emerges. First, there’s the need to crawl out of bed an hour earlier than normal. This act is a normal one for runners; it’s our attempt to outwit our fiercest adversary – humidity. For me, though, it goes beyond just simply outfoxing Mother Nature. I get up an hour early simply to avoid breaking a sweat while I tie my shoes. Success is rare. Then there’s the summer Starbuck’s dilemma. What acts as my writing sanctuary nine months of the year suddenly transforms into a MySpace bazaar replete with coconut Frappuccinos, oversized sunglasses, and one-sided cell phone conversations with what have to be inanimate objects. The curse of capitalism combined with summer vacation.I know what you’re thinking. “Aren’t I on a running website?” The short answer is, “Yes.” There is no long answer. Despite my yinging and yanging, as a runner and a true fan of the sport, there are two things I look forward to every summer: European track meets and the Tour de France. Both events showcase the brightest stars in their respective sports. And they do so in front of capacity crowds. At the recent Meeting Gaz de France, US athletes such as Alan Webb, Bernard Lagat, Chris Lukezic and Sara Slattery competed in front of 75,000 enthusiastic and knowledgeable fans. And what competitive athlete doesn’t get chills watching two cyclists battle up a steep climb with raucous fans lining the street, waving their flags?

As an endurance athlete I can appreciate cycling. I recognize the many similarities between the two sports and I understand the sacrifices that each rider makes to get to that level. But I often wonder if cyclists have the same affinity towards endurance running. I doubt it. Sure, Lance Armstrong, who is making his marathon debut at the NYC Marathon this November, recently admitted that “running is hard” and that training for the marathon has been “more challenging than he expected.” But he was just playing nice, showing respect for his fellow endurance athletes. The truth is that in America cycling has reached the mainstream, but running has not. And despite the common misconception, the variable is not the Lance Factor. No, the reason cycling has reached the mainstream and running hasn’t comes down to one difference - the uniforms.

Cycling uniforms are plastered with corporate logos. The more logos stitched to a jersey, the more money the rider and team receives. The more money that flows through the sport, the more money spent on development and promotion. The more money spent on development and promotion, the more the sport reaches mainstream America. In fact, the corporations demand it. After all, it is their money. If the Tour de France wasn’t televised do you think T-Mobile, Nestle and the Discovery Channel would spend as much money as they do? Of course not. But because they do invest so much money, the sport is able to negotiate a television deal, which provides the corporations a platform to market their products and services.

This principle holds true at the Tour de France level all the way down to the local level. Joe’s Bike Shop decides to sponsor a group of local riders. The riders receive a discount on products, maybe a free bike and, of course, a jersey with “Joe’s Bike Shop” plastered on the
front and back. Joe’s Bike Shop also negotiates with the local Clif Bar rep, resulting in an iron-on Clif Bar logo on the shoulder of every jersey. Joe and Clif Bar get recognition in front of their target audience while the cyclist gets enough support to continue training full time. The cycle (pun intended) continues to grow the sport and everyone’s happy.

Running uniforms, on the other hand, are devoid of any such logos. Yes, the apparel manufacturer is allowed to showcase their logo, but only on the front of the “vest/leotard” (IAAF’s words, not mine) with lettering no taller than 4cm. Ok, first of all, who calls it a vest or leotard? If that doesn’t switch on the light that our sport is outdated you need to check the fusebox. Some argue that commercializing the uniform would ruin the purity of the sport. Wake up! The sport is no longer a bunch of British lads running laps around the quad in wedding gown-white uniforms. The sport is about who is fast and who is faster; who can run far and who can run further. And if you have the ability to run the furthest fastest, we call you Bekele, Tergat or Gebrselassie.

To grow this sport we need more money. There’s a limit to how much money the shoe companies can and will spend. But opening up prime uniform space to multiple corporate sponsors aligns the interests of corporate America with the athletes. Support from multiple sponsors will then sustain a wider variety of athletes and those athletes in turn will provide a unique forum of advertising to a captive audience. Removing the one athlete - one company restraint liberates the “leotard” space and will help running catch up to cycling in terms of mass audience popularity.

I chose cycling as an example because it resembles running in many ways. But I could have chosen NASCAR. Look at what Dupont and Home Depot did for car racing: they turned driving in a circle into the #1 fan sport in America. And look at the #1 fan sport in the whole world - soccer. Or as I, an American with a global perspective, like to call it - soccer. Like running, their biggest stage, the World Cup, happens every four years. And, like running, during that event they wear country-centric “kits” without corporate logos other than that of the manufacturer. But unlike running, during the other 1,458 days they plaster their kits with funny sounding names and strange acronyms, which, as an American with a global perspective, I don’t understand. But what isn’t lost in translation is the fact that those companies are paying lots of money to have their logos stuck on a guy with only one name.

So in summary, uniforms are the key to our success as a sport. Design them well and let them lead the way. And if all else fails, Webb should legally drop his first name. So should Kastor.


Matt Taylor is a washed-up runner, freelance writer, and starving entrepreneur. Last fall he created ChasingTradition.com to document the 2005 collegiate cross country season. A new project is in the works. He has written an un-published book, played soccer, and run 8:57 in the steeplechase. His writing is brought to you by the Boston Red Sox, Starbucks, MySpace, Joe’s Bike Shop, Clif Bar, and the Home Depot, where he once worked in the garden department. He can be reached at matt@chasingtradition.com.

One Runner’s View: What Should I Have Known?

by Zika Palmer

Our next question is for competitive / aspiring runners at all levels:
What is the most important factor in realizing your potential as a long distance runner?

A. A knowledgeable coach
B. A conducive training environment
C. Talent
D. Passion

Undoubtedly all of the above factors are critical in terms of an athlete’s development, so let’s take a minute to address each of the possible answers. The first, a knowledgeable coach, is something each athlete should work to find. A good coach knows the inner workings of the mind and body, can assess the subtleties of training and make changes accordingly. A coach can provide inspiration, hold an athlete back when needed and spur them on as well.

An environment conducive to intense training is extremely important. Access to a support network of fellow athletes chasing similar dreams, a medical community for injury rehabilitation, as well as a set up which allows an athlete to train regularly on a set schedule can make a large difference in an athlete’s situation.

Recently I had a coach tell me “You can’t make chicken salad out of chicken sh_ _ .” In other words, all the hard work in the world won’t make everyone a world beater. The thoroughbred will indeed win more often than the work horse, particularly in the shorter events, and our country’s and the world’s best are replete with good genes.

The answer to this week’s question; however, above all other factors, is passion. Even with the world’s greatest coach a passionless athlete will not succeed. Even with the greatest level of support without passion an athlete will not see long term success. Talent is a close second in our quiz for the day, but even the most talented of athletes (and I have seen this personally) will not reach their best if they don’t have the passion to be great.

For the last three years I have watched former World #1 Ranked Marathoner Patti Dillon speak at our adult camps, and every year her passion nearly brings me to tears. As a young early 20s office worker Dillon was broke, smoking and drinking heavily and didn’t have the slightest clue about athletics. Within 4 years she was traveling the world winning races…and why? Her passion. As a high school athlete I believed I was training, running 15 to 20 miles weekly and taking the weekends off. What little I knew. Patti ran races when all her toe nails had fallen off, she ran with torn muscles, she ran twice a day every day in rain, snow, sleet, heat. She defied the naysayers. When she speaks her drive - that unconquerable passionate drive is infecting. She pumps her fists, jumps up and down flexing her muscles as she implores listeners to feel what she feels.Her passion is her greatest weapon, and the secret.

I have seen the same passion in Bill Rodgers, speaking humbly about his 150-160 mile weeks for months on end and Deena Kastor during her visit to ZAP, reflecting on her decision to move penniless to Alamosa, CO to be coached by Joe Vigil. The same passion I have seen in many of our running campers. Eda Garcia, who came to our center in 2005 having never run more than 3 miles, never gave up - even when told to run 5 miles uphill over 4,000 ft. - she never gave up. This passion is indeed rare, but it is what I search for each day in my own running, and what I wished I had learned earlier. It is what I hope each one of you finds, whether your goal is an Olympic berth or simply the completion of your first 5k. The answer to what it takes to be great is Passion!


Zika Palmer is founder and president of ZAP Fitness in Blowing Rock, NC. She ran for NCAA Division 3 School Emory University and went on to qualify two times for the Olympic Trials in the Marathon with a personal best 2:41.06 in the distance.